If Henry Ford made cameras

Imagine if Henry Ford made cameras. Henry Ford didn’t invent the automobile, he pioneered techniques for apply assembly line manufacturing to the mass production of affordable automobiles. The Ford Model ‘T’ was designed to be simple to operate, maintain and affordable.

The Ford Model ‘T’ was in production for 19 years, and within 10 years of its introduction, more than half the cars in America were Model T’s. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Ford).

Any customer can have a car painted any colour that he wants so long as it is black.

Henry Ford. Remark about the Model T in 1909, published in his autobiography My Life and Work (1922) Chapter IV, p. 71.

So what does this mean to photographers ?. Imagine, if Henry Ford designed and made cameras  – they would be simple to operate, in-expensive, there would be a lot of them on the roads, and they would all be the same.

The point of all this being – most photographers would be using the same camera. There would be no more endless debates on camera brand X being better than brand Y, and no more discussion about ‘some photographers are better because they have better gear’.

The greatest benefit of all photographers having the same camera would be that the great photographers would still be great, and still be able to produce truly inspiration photographs. As for the want-to-be great photographers they would no longer be asking which brand of camera they should buy, or simply buying professional-quality cameras because they think a better camera would lead to better photographs. Instead, the want-to-be better photographers could concentrate on the act and action of photography, and explore their surroundings and thoughts while pressing the shutter.

 

Stewing

In culinary terms ‘stewing can best be described as the process of combining solid food ingredients that have been cooked in liquid and served in the resultant gravy. Ingredients in a stew can include any combination of vegetables (such as carrots, potatoes, beans, peppers and tomatoes, etc.). While water can be used as the stew-cooking liquid, wine, stock, and beer are also common. Seasoning and flavourings may also be added. Stews are typically cooked at a relatively low temperature (simmered, not boiled), allowing flavors to mingle (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stew).

No – this isn’t a blog post about cooking, though the analogy can be used to describe my emotions and physical state.  Although I have taken a Thai cook class and a basic sense of what ingredients and spices are added to the typical Thai meal, in this case, the solid food in this stew is me and my and my family (and mother in-law), traveling for a month in Thailand. We are not used to the heat in south east Asia, to the analogy for stewing in the heat is quite true.

Add some Thai spices; shallots (Culture), garlic (language), green and red chilies (history), dried or fresh coriander (religion), Thai chili powder (festivals), galangal (wildlife-elephants, poisonous snakes and giant insects), green peppercorns (interactions with other tourists), lemongrass (soldiers in the streets – carrying flowers and bottled water (not guns), turmeric (missing friends), kaffir lime leaves,  and fresh basil (incredibly gently and polite people).

As in a typical stew, we have added large amounts of bottled water to the broth, and beer ;>

All those spices need time to simmer and blend to allow the flavors to mingle.

Even after a month in Thailand, the flavor of the stew is not quite right. Too Spicy or Too Sweet ?.  My taste buds can’t seem to get it right; and my heart and emotions need more time to stew and enjoy all of the Thai spices and flavors.

Chaing Mai Loy Krathong Lantern Festival

On the night of the full moon of the twelve-month of the Thai lunar calendar in Chaing Mai, is the Loy Krathong festival. Although the festival continues for three days, it is the evening events that are the most spectacular.

The night sky is filled with thousands of lanterns, fireworks, firecrackers, the streets packed with people, and parade of dancers and elaborately decorated floats pass through the city streets, and Krathong (small floats made from banana leaves and decorated with flowers and a candle), launched in the Mae Ping River on the full moon night to bring good luck.

 

 

SHSB0012-2

A young Monk helps launch this lantern.

 

SHSB0114-2

Some people say a prayer before letting go of the lantern, while others write message on their lantern.

SHSB0032

Tourists launching one of the thousands of sky lanterns.

SHSB0063-2

As the lanterns slowly rise into the night sky, they gradually get smaller and smaller and eventually just disappear into the darkness.

 

SHSB0434-2 SHSB0366

SHSB0722-2

Trails from lighted sky lanterns, floating Krathong on the Mae Ping River in Chaing Mai.

11,973 Photos – Too Many or Not Enough ?

11,973 Photos: Too many, or not enough ?

Before you answer – think about what do Pablo Picasso, Leonardo da Vinci, Vincent van Gogh, Claude Monet, Salvador Dali and Rembrandt have in common ?.

None of these painters were ‘one hit wonders’; their career and popularity was not based on a single painting. They went to school, learned from the masters, imitated the masters, and developed their own techniques, and most importantly, they practiced their technique…they painted, and painted and painted.

The same for can be said for photographers. Annie Leibovitz, Joe McNally, Ansel Adams,  Yousuf Karsh, Henri Cartier-Bresson were not ‘one hit wonders’; each of these photographers took large numbers of photos during their lifetime.

In Malcolm Gladwell’s book ‘Outliers’ he claims that the key to success in any field is, is for the most part due to practicing a specific task for a total of around 10,000 hours.  The same concept applies to photographers;

“Your first 10,000 photographs are your worst.”

― Henri Cartier-Bresson

With modern cameras, you can hold down the shutter release and easily take 10,000 photos. By the math, with a camera that can take 7 frames per second it would take 1428 seconds (or only 24 minutes). Doing this doesn’t achieve anything other than get a blister on your thumb !.

Those 10,000 photos need to be creative, they need intellectual thought, emotion and consideration of point of view, angle, shutter speed, aperture, composition, subject, and lighting. These are but a few things to consider.

Those 11,973 photos – is is enough, or not enough ?. It is not all about the numbers; practice and experience is better.

The take-away message is:

Don’t count the number of photos.

It is better to enjoy what you are doing, learn from what you are doing and and the end of the day, keep only the best.

Be like the monkey in this photo with a bag of garbage: eat (keep) the good stuff, and toss the rest.

November 11 – Rememberance Day

In Canada, Remembrance Day is a memorial day to remember the sacrifices made by young men and women in the service of their nation. At cenotaphs in towns, villages across Canada, at the National War Memorial in Ottawa and at Canadian War Memorials around the world (Vimy Ridge – France, El Alamein Memorial -Egypt, Canadian Korean War Memorial Garden -Republic of Korea, The Man with Two Hats -The Netherlands, Kanchanaburi War Cemetery -Thailand, Juno Beach Centre -France, Sai Wan Memorial -Hong Kong).

Remembrance Day is observed on 11 November to recall the end of hostilities of World War I on that date in 1918.

Canadian soldiers, airmen, sailors served in World War 1, World War 2, The Korean Conflict and in Afghanistan.

SHS_1457

The National War Memorial In Ottawa, Canada

SHS_1459

Although I am now in Thailand, seeming half-a world away from Canada it is 11am on November 11th. My thoughts are in Canada, and thinking about Canadian Veterans: those that survived the battles to protect our County and liberate other countries, and those that did not. My thoughts are on those brave and young Canadians that died during times of peace. This photo is was taken not far from the National War Memorial in Ottawa. I am proud of our Veterans and all that they have done.

 

 

Photo Stock: Making Money For Stock agencies

Like many young, inexperienced and downright naive photographers, I dreamed of making a living from selling photos to stock agencies.

A few years ago, my dream took a step forward, with the “invitation” to submit photo to Getty Images. Had i made it big ?. Somehow, a photo editor at Getty Images had discovered my photos, and selected 25 to be submitted to the Getty Stock pool.

“Whoo Hoo – making money”. I said.

A couple of weeks later, another invitation arrived for 30 images, and a few months later, even more requests.

So, now two years later, and approximately  120 images submitted to Getty Images, Yes -I am making money selling stock images.

Check out my April 2014 Statement.

Three images sold !!! …for a whopping $63.61

Aetty_Images

 

No, that big money isn’t for my pocket, as 80% goes to the stock agency.  My take-home pay is $12.66 which works out to enough money to buy breakfast, one breakfast for the month of April !.

20% to the photographer  – Really ?? .

 

Now – Time to wake up !. To make a living; food, housing, etc….that works out to a whole lot of photos that need to be sold to survive.

A colleague mentioned to me, what if the stock agency actually sold more of your images though didn’t tell you. Oh – now the plot thickens.

Ever heard of a stock agency that sells photos on your behalf, and doesn’t tell you ?. Does this Really happen ?

 

The NWT is on Fire !

At last count there are 130 forest fires in the Northwest Territories.

Check out the image below to see where they are.Canada.A2014183.1845.1km Satellite image from July 2, 2014.

Click here to go to the NASA webpage.

 

A couple of photos of Canadair Cl-215 water bombers that are being used to fight some of the forest fires, and a Beechcraft ‘Birddog’ airplanes for fire attach planning and flight safety.  The photos were taken in Yellowknife a couple of years ago while putting out a fire at the City landfill. All photos taken using a Nikon D700 and manual focus Leica Telyt 400mm f/6.8 lens with a Leitax adapter.

 

_SCH8551   _SCH8676 (2)    _SCH8765-2 (2) _SCH8781-2 (2) _SCH8831-2 DSC_9102-2 SHS_6935-2 SHS_6980

Models – To help recognize the real thing

A couple of weeks ago I submitted the final draft for the 2014 May/June edition of the YkEdge. Although I can’t say much about the article (about airplanes), other than building models is one way to learn how to recognize airplanes by their shapes.

This model, a DHC-5 Buffalo isn’t your typical “model kit-in-a-box” with pieces of plastic that easily fit together. Instead, it was built from scratch using scale plans, a sheet of flat plastic, glue, a couple of tubes of putty, and lots of patience and elbow grease.

Like the real thing, this model is made up of ribs, stringers and an outer skin, although it is 72 times smaller.

During the 12 years to complete this model, I’ve viewed it from every possible angle, including in pieces on the kitchen floor !. It is not likely that I could mistake it for another airplane.

1/72 scale scratch built dehavilland Canada DHC-5

The DHC-5 Buffalo is used by the Royal Canadian Air Force for Search and Rescue, mostly in British Columbia and is occasionally seen in the Northwest Territories. The model is photographed with some of the tools-of-the trade, including a FindMe SPOT (personal emergency locator beacon), pen flare, whistle and compass, on a background of aeronautical charts.

Documenting Land Cover and Vegetation Productivity Changes in the Yellowknife Area using the Landsat Satellite Archive

It is mid July, and you are motor boating through a myriad of islands on the way to your cabin. All is well until the prop hits a rock. You had been through this channel a million times before, and had never hit a rock. What’s Up ?. A few minutes later, as the boat rounds the last island before the cabin, you realise that the trees and shrubs look different. The cleared area in front of the cabin is now covered with shrubs, the shoreline is much farther back than it used to be, and the cabin is starting to sink into the ground !.  We all know that water levels change during the year, and that shrubs grow in cleared areas. Some of these changes could be just a natural part of a cycle, but what if they aren’t?.

To help understand, the causes and effects of these landscape changes, and if the changes that we are seeing on the landscape are part of a natural cycle or longer-term trend, a team of Federal, Territorial and University scientists are working on a project in the Yellowknife area. Using satellite imagery collected during the past 30 years, and remote sensing techniques we were able to visualize past and on-going changes to the landscape. One of the techniques, called Tasseled Cap Transformation, uses mathematical formulas to calculate values for brightness, greenness and wetness from a satellite image. Brightness represents a measure of reflectance from the surface; features such as bare soil, man-made, and natural features such as concrete, asphalt, gravel, rock outcrops, and other bare areas are considered bright. Greenness is a measure of vegetation; more vegetation is indicated by brighter green areas. Wetness is a measure of surface wetness including soil and plant moisture; wetter areas on the surface indicated by brighter colors on the satellite image. Satellite images spanning the 30 years of available data were analysed for landscape features that represent the Tasseled cap values for Brightness, Greenness, and Wetness.  Combining the Tasseled cap values from each separate satellite image, allows the long-term trends in the change of Tasseled cap values for Brightness, Greenness, and Wetness can be observed.  In Figure 1, the combined Tasseled cap values for Brightness are represented as shades of red, Greenness in shades of green, and Wetness in shades of blue, with brighter colors representing brighter, greener and wetter areas.

Figure 1

 

So, what do all the colors mean ?. Using field observations and photos taken from a helicopter, we are able to directly relate the trends (and colors) to observable and recognizable features on the landscape. A photo from the helicopter (Figure 2) over the circled on Figure 1, shows a small inlet with ring of brown vegetation (drying wetlands) and an inner ring of bright green vegetation (new vegetation growth). The combined Tasseled cap colors Brightness, Greenness, and Wetness for this area are yellow and green respectively, suggesting a trend during the past 30 years of yellow areas indicating drying up wetlands, and green areas where there is new vegetation growth.  Similarly, areas shown in pink (top left, Figure 1) are presumed to be non-vegetated shallow water areas including dried bogs (Figure 3). A photo of the old and new sections of Highway 3 (Figure 4), shows new vegetation growth on the old section, and paved, wide cleared area with no vegetation, corresponding to light blue and red areas on Figure 1. Areas shown in dark blue, are presumed to be the result of a change to a darker and a wetter forest.  The greenish color and banded pattern in the water is a by-product of processing of the imagery and can be ignored.

 

Figure 2

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 4

Figure 4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Based on this work, we observed the two major trends shown in the Tasseled Cap Transformation:

1)    Apparent lowering of water levels along the shoreline of Great Slave Lake, and in nearby lakes, and shoreline vegetation appears to have expanded in bays. What is not yet fully understood, is the cause of the apparent lowering; it is due to lowering water levels and/or isostatic uplift (land rising after the weight of the glaciers has been removed). Most likely it is a combination of both.

2)      Apparent increasing treed vegetation (Dark blue areas on Figure 1). A working hypothesis to explain this trend is that growing conditions have changed such that it is now better for conifer trees such as spruce and jack pine. Additional research work is in progress to understand the increasing treed vegetation.

 

What do these trends mean in the long-term ?. Are some of these changes just a natural part of a cycle ?. Or – is there any reason to believe that these are the early part of a longer and continuous trend leading to a major climate shift ?.

The data used in this study used satellite imagery that is only available going back 30 years, and does not give any indication of what climatic and landscape changes were occurring in the region 60, 100, 500 or 1000 years ago. Without the long term record, not realistically possible to make long term predictions of the landscape changes into the future. In the short term however, we can predict that water levels will continue to lower and, if growing conditions have recently become better suited to conifer growth, there may be a successional transition from broadleaf forest (beech trees) to conifer trees.

In this project, we have shown landscape change trends in the Yellowknife area. For you, these trends might make it more difficult to navigate to your cabin, and how and where you build your cabin. More importantly, some of the trends in landscape changes observed via the Tasseled Cap Transformation may represent changes which cannot be directly observed. A trend indicating a transition to more-dominate to conifer may also affect the frequency and abundance of forest fires, and may also reflect a change (degradation) in underlying permafrost patterns. The impact of degrading permafrost may have a large impact on a wide range of infrastructure. Anyone who has driven Highway 3 (Yellowknife –  Behchoko) will certainly remember a few bumps in the road, the vast majority of which were caused by changes in the permafrost under the highway.

There probably isn’t too much that can be done locally to prevent many of the changes.  It is however, important to continue research to understand the underlying causes for the changes. Continued monitoring the changes, will provide useful information to decision makers, for example by showing which areas and terrain features are more sensitive and susceptible to change.

 

This work is conducted as part of and Natural Resources Canada’s project on Transportation Risk and Climate Sensitivity (TRACS).

Reference: Seventh International Conference and Workshop on the Analysis of Multi-temporal Remote Sensing Images (MultiTemp 2013), Banff, Alberta, Canada, June 25-27, 2013.

Fraser, R.H1, Olthof, I.1, Deschamps, A.1, Pregitzer, M.1, Kokelj, S.2, Lantz, T.3, Wolfe, S.4, Brooker, A.5, Lacelle, D.5, and Schwarz, S.6

 

(1) Canada Centre for Remote Sensing, Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, ON

(2) Renewable Resources and Environment, Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada, Yellowknife, NWT

(3) School of Environmental Studies, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC

(4) Geological Survey of Canada, Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, ON

(5) Department of Geography, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON

(6) NWT Centre for Geomatics, Govt of the Northwest Territories, Yellowknife, NWT

 

 

 

Yellowknife – INSAR

Another satellite in our tool box is the Canadian designed and built Radarsat. Compared to most other satellites, it does not take pretty pictures. Instead, the Radarsat satellite fires a radar beam to earth at a specific wavelength, and the beam bounces off the surface of the earth and returns back the satellite. Differential Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (D-InSAR) is a technique that uses repeat synthetic aperture radar (SAR) observations, separated in time, of the same area on the Earth’s surface to detect small movements of the ground surface. Since the satellite is moving in an along a fixed orbit at constant height above earth surface, the distance between the satellite and a specific point on the earth’s surface is a constant. With a repeat observation, millimeter-scale changes in the distance between the satellite and the earth’s surface can be calculated by comparing the phase shift of the wavelength of the radar signal that was fired by the satellite. A 3D model (digital elevation model) is used to remove the phase difference resulting from topography and the remaining phase difference is converted to vertical displacement which represents the displacement of the ground surface. Although this is a simplistic explanation of the process, a more detailed discussion of these processing steps may be found in Short et al. (2011).

InSAR

Using SAR data collected during the summer of 2010, scientists at the Canada Centre for Remote Sensing, the Geological Survey of Canada, along with their northern partners, used differential interferometry techniques to map ground surface displacement in the Yellowknife area. Figure XY shows the ground displacement derived using stacked RADARSAT-2 D-InSAR from May 23 to September 20, 2012. The results are categorized in terms of the relative amount of displacement rather than focussing on the absolute values (units are in meters). Areas shown in red and yellow, are undergoing low and moderate downward displacement (subsidence) in the range of -1 to -3 cm and -3 to -6 cm per season, respectively. Ground that is considered stable, where no vertical change was calculated is shaded in blue.  Areas where the displacement is upward, due to ground surface heave or vegetation growth of up to 6 cm, are shown in pink.  At some locations, labeled ‘Incoherent’ the vertical change is presumed to be significant and is beyond the measuring capabilities of the D-InSAR process.

 

The ground surface displacements shown on the map are considered to be seasonal since they occurred during the May to September time period. Areas of downward displacement may result from seasonal subsidence caused by thawing of the active layer (seasonally-frozen ground) or permafrost (perennially-frozen ground) or soil compaction. Upward surface displacement may result from ground surface heave or, under certain circumstances, vegetation growth. The latter represents an apparent upward displacement that is not the product of ground surface displacement. Both downward and upward ground surface displacements may be from natural and human-induced processes.

Verification of the results of the InSAR displacement in areas identified as having moderate seasonal surface subsidence. We observed and measured indications of subsidence such as undulating roadways, areas that were presumed or measured to have been levelled when constructed, and noted and measured cracks and rotated sidewalks.

 

Summary:

The purpose of this study is to present and interpret D-InSAR measurements of seasonal surface displacement over discontinuous permafrost terrain in Yellowknife. We conducted field verification to support the results observed by the InSAR process by documenting areas undergoing low and moderate downward displacement and noting the impacts on private property and municipal infrastructure. Mapping of surface displacement is important to assess ground and infrastructure stability, and to monitor mitigation in problem areas, and to plan future land use. Surface displacement may be from natural or human-induced processes that cause vertical movement of the ground. In Yellowknife, and other areas in northern Canada, surface displacement may be caused by freezing and thawing of the active layer (seasonally-frozen layer) or the permafrost (perennially-frozen ground). This presents challenges that increase the cost of constructing and maintaining infrastructure (e.g. roads and buildings), especially if the displacement continues in the same direction over an extended period of time. The knowledge of where the problem areas occur and the relative magnitude of displacement provides engineers and municipal planners with key information required to reduce the cost and risk of developing and maintaining northern infrastructure.

Reference:

Wolfe, S., Short, N., Morse, P., Olthof, I., Schwarz, S., Stevens, C. (2013). Application of RADARSAT-2 D-InSAR season surface displacement to municipal land use in discontinuous permafrost terrain, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, Canada. fCorresponding author, . ** Note: this work is not yet published

 

Short, N., Brisco, B., Couture, N., Pollard, W., Murnaghan, K. and Budkewitsch, P. 2011. A comparison of TerraSAR-X, RADARSAT-2 and ALOS-PALSAR interferometry for monitoring permafrost environments, case study from Herschel Island, Canada. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115, 3491–3506, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2011.08.012.